Sunday, March 27, 2016

the Boeing 737 has endured 49 years


The Boeing Century, 1916-2016

http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20160327/NEWS01/160329196

Almost cancelled, the Boeing 737 has endured 49 years


A Boeing worker is dwarfed by a 737 engine at the production plant in Renton last Tuesday.
Kevin Clark / The Herald
A Boeing worker is dwarfed by a 737 engine at the production plant in Renton last Tuesday.
By Dan Catchpole
Herald Writer
Published:
The Boeing Co. is turning 100 on July 15. Throughout the year, The Daily Herald is covering the people, airplanes and moments that define the Boeing century.

RENTON — The grass airstrip in Hope, British Columbia, is best suited for hobby flying — Cessnas, Piper Cubs and gliders.

In 1972, though, the Hope Aerodrome helped resurrect flagging Boeing 737 sales and avoid the program's cancellation.

Now, the single-aisle airplane can be found on flight paths and at airports around the globe. It is the best-selling commercial jetliner ever and makes up about a quarter of the world's passenger jets, with one taking off every two seconds.

That wasn't the case in the program's early years. It almost was cancelled before it was even launched. In 1964, Boeing leadership was split over developing a small, regional jetliner. Its biggest competitor, the Douglas Aircraft Co., had already beaten it to the market with the DC-9, as had several European airplane makers. So Boeing executives punted on making a decision.

Boeing's visionary engineer, Jack Steiner, pushed the company to commit to the 737. Finally, he went around Boeing chief executive Bill Allen to directly lobby company board members to back the airplane program, which they did.

In early 1965, Lufthansa ordered 21 of the compact airplanes only after Boeing promised it wouldn't cancel the 737 for lack of orders. United Air Lines ordered 40 airplanes a couple of months later. The airline wanted something bigger than the 737-100 version ordered by Lufthansa. So, right away, Boeing stretched the plane into the 737-200, the first of 12 commercial versions.

Airlines ordered 83 737s that year, which, at the time, wasn't bad for a new jetliner. But Douglas collected nearly three times as many orders — 209 — for the DC-9, which also went into service in 1965. The Long Beach, Calif., company's jet regularly outsold Boeing's 737 for the next few years.

With sales lagging, Boeing leadership considered selling the 737 program to a Japanese manufacturer, said Peter Morton, a retired Boeing vice president who was the 737 program's marketing manager from 1969 to 1974. Before that he was an engineer on the program.

“It was a volatile time. The company was in financial straits, and everything was on the table,” he said.

One of his first jobs as marketing manager was to lead a task force studying whether to keep, close or sell the airplane program.

His team's answer to company executives was clear: Keep the 737. It can compete and even outsell the DC-9, he said.

A Wien Air Alaska 737 kicks up dust on an unpaved runway. The airline ordered nine 737-200Cs in 1966, making it one of the plane’s first operato...
Boeing Co.
A Wien Air Alaska 737 kicks up dust on an unpaved runway. The airline ordered nine 737-200Cs in 1966, making it one of the plane’s first operators. Wien Air folded in 1985.
The task force figured that the 737 could serve customers and markets ignored by the DC-9 and other small jets. The 737 could operate from remote airports with unpaved runways, and it could carry a mix of cargo and passengers on its main deck.

Morton knew he had to show customers that the plane could fly in and out of rough airports. Looking for a nearby airport to show off the plane's capabilities, he came across a 4,000-foot-long grass runway in Hope, British Columbia. On Sept. 13, 1972, with a camera rolling, a 737-200 painted in the company's black-and-mustard-brown livery touched down in Hope, the plane's nose wheel digging a deep rut in the ground.

“I believe the Hope authorities billed us pretty heavily to get the ruts out of that airport,” Morton says in the marketing video shot that day.

Boeing engineers figured out how to keep future ruts from happening and to keep dust and gravel out of the engines. With the video in hand, Morton and other 737 program members scoured the world for sales.

“We took that airplane all over the world” and found plenty of new ways to show it off, he said.

During a sales pitch in Peru, a bird was sucked into one of the plane's engines. The Boeing pilot “ever so calmly cut the engine that had swallowed the bird,” he said. “You could smell the burnt bird. When we landed, there were still feathers in the engine.”

A handful of sales in the early '70s to Sabena, in Belgium, plus a trio of jointly-operated Brazilian airlines and the U.S. Navy were vital to keeping the program alive.

“We sold 10 planes to Sabena, and the place went nuts. The factory bells were ringing, people were cheering. These days, no one blinks when you sell 10 planes,” Morton said.

The first Boeing 737 MAX takes off on Jan. 29, 2016, from Renton Municipal Airport. Boeing has logged more than 3,000 orders for the most recent, MAX ...
Boeing Co.
The first Boeing 737 MAX takes off on Jan. 29, 2016, from Renton Municipal Airport. Boeing has logged more than 3,000 orders for the most recent, MAX version of the plane.
Even as the 737's fate hung in the balance, engineers and designers were working on improvements.

“Boeing's a complicated company,” he explained. “You can have a team of engineers improving the airplane at the same time you have the bean-counters running the numbers on closing the program.”

Over the past 49 years, the 737 has been reinvented for the evolving market. The 737-100 was so unpopular with customers only 30 were ever made, and most of those were for Lufthansa's first order.

“Basically, it was — what's the technical term? — a crappy product early on,” said Adam Pilarski, a leading aerospace economist. He is a vice president at Avitas, a consulting firm in Virginia.

Boeing unveiled the first major overhaul — the 737-200 Advanced — in 1971. It could hold more passengers and fly farther. It quickly became the standard for the 737-200, which ended production in 1988 after more than 1,000 airplanes. Two years later, the 737 became the best-selling commercial aircraft.

“Boeing is really good at continuously improving products, and that's what they did” with the 737, said Pilarski, who worked for McDonnell Douglas.

Boeing’s Renton plant in the 1980s was crowded with 737 and 757 assembly.
Marcus R. Donner
Boeing’s Renton plant in the 1980s was crowded with 737 and 757 assembly.
While Boeing was improving its airplanes, “Douglas was not very well managed,” he said. “Douglas ran out of money,” McDonnell bought the company, and “McDonnell couldn't care less about commercial” airplanes.

DC-9 sales flagged in the 1970s, while Boeing gained market share. Demand shot up after Congress opened up domestic air routes to new competition. Many small regional airlines expanded out of state, and a flurry of new ones came along. Many airlines — new and old — went shopping for jets. In 1977, Boeing sold 37 737s. The next year, when Congress deregulated commercial aviation, Boeing sold 145 737s. For the first time since the Baby Boeing debuted, North American airlines consistently placed orders.

Along the way, Boeing continued tweaking the aircraft and introduced new versions: the Classics (737-300, -400 and -500) in the 1980s, followed by the 737 Next Generation (NG) (737-600, -700, -800 and -900) and, most recently, the 737 MAX (737 MAX 7, -8 and -9).

Boeing 737 market shares at a glance. Download the bigger PDF version linked at the top of the story.
Boeing 737 market shares at a glance. Download the bigger PDF version linked at the top of the story.
There's only one plane that rivals its success: the Airbus A320, the second best-selling commercial jetliner.

The European airplane maker caught Boeing off guard in the 1980s, when it launched its single-aisle workhorse, the A320 family. The airplane had fly-by-wire controls and other tech advances. Since the A320's introduction, Airbus has slightly outsold Boeing in the single-aisle market.

The two are now competing with their newest versions — the A320neo and the 737 MAX. At the same time, airplane makers in Brazil, Canada, China and Russia are looking to break into the lucrative single-aisle market.

Still, fans of the 737 say it will be flying for decades to come, possibly even long enough to see its own centennial.

“It's an amazing machine,” said Dan Dornseif,a commercial 737 pilot. He's writing a history of the airplane — “Boeing 737: The World's Jetliner” — for Schiffer Publishing. “It's incredibly reliable and handles very well.”

Its flexibility, durability and affordability are strong selling points. And while the fuselage has been stretched, strengthened and lightened, it retains essentially the same structure as the 737-100.

“Like a house, you have to start with a good foundation,” Dornseif said.

Dan Catchpole: 425-339-3454; dcatchpole@heraldnet.com; Twitter: @dcatchpole.

737 models through the years

Many factors affect a plane's range and capacity. This list uses typical midrange values for each 737 version.

737-100
First flight: April 9, 1967
Launch customer: Lufthansa
Total built (unfilled orders): 30
Production: 1967-1969
Capacity (two class): 85
Range (nautical miles): 1,150
Length: 93 feet, 9 inches
Wingspan: 93 feet


Passengers in Peru board a 737 equipped with a gravel kit, which protects the engines from debris that can be kicked up on unpaved runways.
Boeing Co.
Passengers in Peru board a 737 equipped with a gravel kit, which protects the engines from debris that can be kicked up on unpaved runways.
737-200
First flight: Aug. 8, 1967
Launch customer: United Airlines
Total built (unfilled orders): 1,095
Production: 1968-1988
Capacity (two class): 110
Range (nautical miles): 2,500
Length: 100 feet, 2 inches
Wingspan: 93 feet

737-300
First flight: Feb. 24, 1984
Launch customer: US Air
Total built (unfilled orders): 1,113
Production: 1984-1999
Capacity (two class): 126
Range (nautical miles): 2,255
Length: 109 feet, 7 inches
Wingspan: 94 feet, 9 inches

737-400
First flight: Feb. 19, 1988
Launch customer: Piedmont (PI)
Total built (unfilled orders): 486
Production: 1988-1999
Capacity (two class): 147
Range (nautical miles): 2,060
Length: 119 feet, 7 inches
Wingspan: 94 feet, 9 inches

737-500
First flight: June 30, 1989
Launch customer: Southwest Airlines
Total built (unfilled orders): 389
Production: 1990-1999
Capacity (two class): 110
Range (nautical miles): 2,375
Length: 101 feet, 9 inches
Wingspan: 94 feet, 9 inches

737-600
First flight: Jan. 22, 1998
Launch customer: SAS
Total built (unfilled orders): 66 (3)
Production: 1998-
Capacity (two class): 110
Range (nautical miles): 3,235
Length: 102 feet, 6 inches
Wingspan: 112 feet, 7 inches

737-700
First flight: Feb. 9, 1997
Launch customer: Southwest Airlines
Total built (unfilled orders): 1,133 (53)
Production: 1997-
Capacity (two class): 126
Range (nautical miles): 3,010
Length: 110 feet, 4 inches
Wingspan: 112 feet, 7 inches

737-800
First flight: July 31, 1997
Launch customer: Hapag Lloyd (TUI Group)
Total built (unfilled orders): 4,002 (1,108)
Production: 1998-
Capacity (two class): 162
Range (nautical miles): 2,935
Length: 129 feet, 6 inches
Wingspan: 112 feet, 7 inches

737-900
First flight: Aug. 3, 2000
Launch customer: Alaska Airlines
Total built (unfilled orders): 371 (144)
Production: 2001-
Capacity (two class): 178
Range (nautical miles): 2,950
Length: 138 feet, 2 inches
Wingspan: 112 feet, 7 inches

737 MAX 7
First flight: —
Launch customer: Southwest Airlines
Total built (unfilled orders): (3,072)*
Production: n/a
Capacity (two class): 126
Range (nautical miles): 3,350
Length: 110 feet, 5 inches
Wingspan: 117 feet, 10 inches

737 MAX 8
First flight: Jan 29, 2016
Launch customer: Southwest Airlines
Total built (unfilled orders): (3,072)*
Production: 2015-
Capacity (two class): 162
Range (nautical miles): 3,515
Length: 129 feet, 8 inches
Wingspan: 117 feet, 10 inches

737 MAX 9
First flight: —
Launch customer: Lion Air
Total built (unfilled orders): (3,072)*
Production: n/a
Capacity (two class): 178
Range (nautical miles): 3,515
Length: 138 feet, 4 inches
Wingspan: 117 feet, 10 inches

* All MAX orders are grouped together. Based on announcements, the MAX 8 has far outsold the other two versions. Boeing has not publicly disclosed total orders for each MAX version.

Sources: Boeing Co., Aviation Safety Network, “Boeing 737-100 and 200” (MBI Publishing)

A worker examines the vertical stabilizer of a Boeing 737 at the company's factory in Renton last week.
Kevin Clark / The Herald
A worker examines the vertical stabilizer of a Boeing 737 at the company's factory in Renton last week.

The 737's many names

During its 49 years, the Boeing 737 has gone by many names.

Flying Football: Boeing engineer Jack Steiner's description of the 737-100's short, wide fuselage.

Fighter: Some Boeing workers dubbed it the fighter due to its small size compared to the 707 and 727.

Baby Boeing: Its most famous moniker and another nod to its small stature. (Detecting a theme?)

Bobby: Short for Boeing Baby.

FLUFF: Fat Little Ugly * Fellow, a variant on an off-color nickname for the B-52.

Li'l Toot: The name given to the very first 737 during flight testing.

Fat Albert: A nod to the plane's stubby nose.

Story tags » Boeing737History

Friday, March 11, 2016

F-35 Chief: Think Very, Very Hard Before Making Another Joint Fighter

F-35 Chief: Think Very, Very Hard Before Making Another Joint Fighter 

 

 http://www.defenseone.com/technology/2016/03/f-35-chief-think-very-very-hard-making-another-joint-fighter/126587/

 

Lt. Gen. Chris Bogdan has a bit of advice for Air Force and Navy leaders envisioning their next tactical aircraft

Perhaps the only thing U.S. military leaders know about their next fighter jet is this: they want the program to go better than the F-35’s did.


 he sixth-generation fighter effort is still in its infancy; the aircraft it produces may not fly for decades. The Pentagon hasn’t even decided whether to build separate planes for the Navy and Air Force. But the services’ leaders are already cooperating to figure out how the futuristic fighter will fit into the battlefield of the future — and how they can avoid another tactical aircraft program that winds up so late, over budget, and short of its goals.


Ask the F-35 program’s current director for advice, and you’ll get this gentle warning: joint programs are hard.


“I’m not saying they’re bad. I’m not saying they’re good. I’m just saying they’re hard,” Air Force Lt. Gen. Christopher Bogdan said Thursday. “[Y]ou ought to think really hard about what you really need out of the sixth-generation fighter and how much overlap is there between what the Navy and the Air Force really need.”


When the F-35 was conceived in the 1990s, the goal was to buy a common plane for the Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps, and even America’s allies.

The Air Force version would fly from traditional runways, the Navy version would operate from aircraft carriers, and the Marine version would be built to take off from short runways and land vertically.

The goal was to have all three have 70 percent of their parts in common, which was meant to save billions of dollars in development and logistics costs.


But engineering changes have produced three variants that have only 20 percent of their parts in common, Bogdan said at a conference sponsored by McAleese and Associates and Credit Suisse.


If Pentagon leaders do choose to build a multi-variant plane to serve multiple sets of requirements, he says, the services will have to embrace compromise to a greater degree than happened in the $400 billion F-35 program.


“Man, is [compromise] a hard thing to do when you’re spending billions of dollars,” he said, “You want what you want, [but] hopefully get what you need.”
And indeed, some top military leaders are hinting that another joint, F-35-like project is not in the works.


“We will have some different requirements for what we need based on the different things we are expected to provide for the joint force,” Lt. Gen. James “Mike” Holmes, Air Force deputy chief of staff for plans and requirements, told reporters last month. “We will use common technologies and maybe some common things, but at this point we think it will be a different enough mission that it won’t be the same airplane.”
Asked Thursday whether the Navy would work with the Air Force to buy a new sixth-generation aircraft, Adm. John Richardson, the chief of naval operations, said, “It’s really too early to make a conclusive statement in that regard.”
Richardson said the two services, which are already discussing the key capabilities of a fighter that might first see combat in the 2030s, will keep talking with one another.
“Even in the early stages, [the Navy is] committed to working with the Air Force on that so that we kind of learn from each other as effectively as we can,” the admiral said at the conference.
For now, Richardson said, the Navy is more focused on figuring out how to fly drones alongside manned aircraft on its aircraft carriers. “There’s just so much to learn about integrating unmanned aviation into the carrier air wing right now, but I just want to get started,” he said.
In the meantime, defense firms have been pitching concepts of their own for nearly a decade: planes armed with lasers, special engines that don’t give off heat, and more. Now if they can just come up with a way to help keep the program itself on track.

Does United's move mean end of the line for the 747?

Does United's move mean end of the line for the 747?

 http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-boeing-747-decline-htmlstory.html

 

United's announcement this week that it is speeding up retirement of its Boeing 747s comes after years of talk of the iconic jumbo jet's demise.
Changes in airline fleets move slowly, and United's announcement would take years to implement, but the Chicago-based airline's transition is part of a global trend. "The Boeing 747 has been in the sunset of its product life cycle for many years," said Rob Morris, head of consultancy at Ascend, an aircraft industry observer. "Many other operators are making similar replacement decisions, and we thus expect the fleet trend to continue its decline."
United said it will turn to 777 and 787 to meet its capacity needs.
Boeing has faith in the 747 and pointed at growing cargo use and success in intercontinental flights. "While the current business environment may have slowed interest by some customers, we have a number of active campaigns underway and expect activity to pick up with the economy," said Tom Kim, a company spokesman. Kim said Boeing's projections show the need for 650 new cargo 747s in the next 20 years.
However, Morris pointed to the implications in the downward slope of 747s in service. "It seems only a matter of time before Boeing decides to terminate production of the aircraft," Morris said in an email. "Of course, when that decision is finally taken, the 747 will be judged as a significant success for Boeing."
The creation of the iconic 747 took the work of 50,000 engineers, mechanics, construction workers and administrators over a period of less than 16 months during the late 1960s. The first flight was Feb. 9, 1969. Through the years the plane was modified for various roles. Among the variants were military adaptations, expanded cargo and passenger space and hybrids using other Boeing planes.

Special duties

The 747s currently serve in two primary capacities, passenger and freight. The characteristic hump can be used for a first-class passenger lounge, and after removal of seats, modified with a hinged nose cone that flips up to load cargo easier. The plane also has a colorful past of unique functions.